Margaux Rouvroy vs Jeline Vandromme Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Oct at 12:15 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Rouvroy vs J. Vandromme

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

BEL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Rouvroy 0 - 1 Vandromme
They have played 3 sets in total, with Margaux Rouvroy winning 1 and Jeline Vandromme winning 2. The last match between Jeline Vandromme and Margaux Rouvroy was at the W35 Reims, 02-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Jeline Vandromme getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rouvroy | 0 |
| Vandromme | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Reims(10-02-25)
M. Rouvroy vs J. Vandromme H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $123,170 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.84% (187-142) | Career Total W/L | 70.00% (49-21) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 4 | Titles | 4 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
M. Rouvroy vs J. Vandromme Match Preview:
- In recent form, Margaux Rouvroy edges out Jeline Vandromme slightly in winning points on their second serve, achieving 37.86% compared to Vandromme's 36.66%. How significant is a 1.2% difference? In closely contested matches, it may suggest a modest advantage on serve for Rouvroy.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Rouvroy has dominated, winning 54.08% of points, overshadowing Vandromme's 45.23%. Would a stronger return game provide Rouvroy a tactical edge? It significantly influences the match dynamics.
- Rouvroy also surpasses Vandromme on first serve returns, with a 2.57% higher success rate. Can this small margin impact her overall gameplan? It could slightly favor her in service return games.
- Under pressure, saving breakpoints more effectively (52.71% vs 39.41%) suggests Rouvroy is more resilient. Why does this matter? It could help her hold serve in crucial moments.
- Overall match victories in the past year favor Vandromme with 82.05%, against Rouvroy's 50.85%. Does a higher win rate reflect greater consistency? It shows Vandromme's sustained form.
- Surface preferences reveal Vandromme excels on hard courts (87%), while Rouvroy prefers indoor hard surfaces (87%). Which surface favors the upcoming match? This could determine player adaptability.
- Comparing player level, Vandromme shines at the $10K tournaments with an 84% win rate, whereas Rouvroy has a 49.02% win rate in higher-stakes tournaments. Does playing higher-level events offer an experience edge? Rouvroy might have faced tougher competition.
- Average opponent ranking suggests Margaux Rouvroy has faced more challenging opponents (ranked 281.63) than Vandromme (ranked 428.72). Does this indicate an edge in handling high-level play? It could imply Rouvroy’s readiness for tough matches.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Vandromme possesses a slightly better performance (44% vs. 40%). Will endurance play a crucial role? It may tip the scales if the match is tightly contested.
Editorial Prediction (October 2, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming tennis match, several factors are at play. While Jeline Vandromme's stellar win percentage over the past year highlights her consistency, Margaux Rouvroy's superior serving stats and ability to face tougher competition may indicate her stronger adaptability in challenging matchups.
Rouvroy's advantage in saving breakpoints and performing against higher-ranked opponents is noteworthy, suggesting her proficiency in stressful scenarios. However, Vandromme's edge in deciding sets could be pivotal if the match extends to its limits.
Ultimately, Vandromme's overall match-winning consistency combines with a slight edge in deciding set performance. These factors may tilt the outcome in her favor. Predicting from this analysis, Jeline Vandromme is slightly more likely to win this match.
Margaux Rouvroy vs Jeline Vandromme Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Rouvroy vs J. Vandromme H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 15 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:48:23 | Average Match Time | 1:48:23 |
| 63% (45/71) | 1st Serve % | 69% (54/78) |
| 69% (31/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (39/54) |
| 38% (10/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (12/24) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 35% (27/78) | Return Points Win % | 42% (30/71) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Rouvroy Recent Matches Played
J. Vandromme Recent Matches Played

M. Rouvroy vs J. Vandromme Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.84% (187/142) | YTD Win/Loss | 70.00% (49/21) |
| 56.11% (427/334) | Sets Win/Loss | 67.92% (108/51) |
| 52.70% (3700/3321) | Games Win/Loss | 59.47% (813/554) |
| 51.06% (24/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 86.67% (26/4) |
| 55.43% (102/82) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.62% (17/12) |
| 62.24% (61/37) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 630 | Aces Total | 66 |
| 0.53 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1827 | Total Double Faults | 224 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:33:18 |
| 434.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 404.09 |
| 64% (13530/21144) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2824/4333) |
| 60% (8160/13530) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1784/2824) |
| 42% (3161/7614) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (725/1509) |
| 50% (1392/2783) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 54% (312/580) |
| 48% (9844/20578) | Return Points Win % | 50% (2062/4154) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.72% (135/103) | Challenger W/L | 63.64% (14/8) |
| 60.00% (45/30) | Futures W/L | 72.34% (34/13) |
| 57% (186/326) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (48/69) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (21/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 49% (51/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (8/18) |
| 84% (189/159) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (54/46) |
| 16% (189/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (54/8) |
| 19% (139/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (16/3) |